<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="10115">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>Comparative Study Of Korean Entertainment Agencies In Responding To Cancel Culture Faced By Their Artists</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <name type="Personal Name" authority="">
  <namePart>Annisa Rais Marwati</namePart>
  <role>
   <roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm>
  </role>
 </name>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Jakarta</placeTerm>
   <publisher>LSPR</publisher>
   <dateIssued>2025</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code">en</languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd">Text</form>
  <extent></extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>The South Korean entertainment industry is highly competitive, where public image is very crucial for an artist’s career. However, “cancel culture” poses a significant challenge, swiftly damaging reputations and impacting both artists and their agencies. This study compares the crisis responses of three major Korean entertainment agencies—SM Entertainment, Cube Entertainment, and JYP Entertainment—regarding controversies involving Seunghan (formerly RIIZE), Soojin (formerly (G)I-DLE), and Lia (ITZY). Using Fink’s Four-Stage Crisis Model, a qualitative comparative analysis and a Post-Positivism paradigm examines agency strategies. Findings reveal distinct approaches: SM prioritized damage control with limited transparency, Cube completely distanced itself from Soojin, and JYP shifting the media narratives. These differences highlight the role of corporate strategy, stakeholder engagement, and media influence in crisis management. The study concludes that while cancel culture pressures the industry, agency responses determine long-term reputational impacts.&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
Keywords: Study Comparative, Cancel Culture, Korean Entertainment Industry, Crisis Response</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <subject authority="">
  <topic>kualitatif</topic>
 </subject>
 <subject authority="">
  <topic>thesis</topic>
 </subject>
 <subject authority="">
  <topic>Dr. Joe Harrianto Setiawan</topic>
 </subject>
 <subject authority="">
  <topic>Annisa Rais Marwati</topic>
 </subject>
 <subject authority="">
  <topic>2025</topic>
 </subject>
 <classification>NONE</classification>
 <identifier type="isbn"></identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>Library LSPR Institute of Communication and Business Amani Library Management System</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator>S2.SPRM-CC.004.25</shelfLocator>
  <holdingSimple>
   <copyInformation>
    <numerationAndChronology type="1">S202803SP</numerationAndChronology>
    <sublocation>Hanya Tersedia Softcopy</sublocation>
    <shelfLocator>S2.SPRM-CC.004.25</shelfLocator>
   </copyInformation>
  </holdingSimple>
 </location>
 <slims:digitals/>
 <slims:image>sampul_skripsi.jpeg.jpeg</slims:image>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>10115</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2026-01-28 11:29:59</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2026-01-29 11:44:15</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>